<\/p>\n
Paul Adams<\/strong><\/p>\n There has been a dramatic shift in the Canadian political landscape in recent months. During the summer, the Liberals gradually gave up the advantage they had enjoyed over the Conservatives during most of the spring; but even as recently as the first weekly poll in September from EKOS (where I participate in the political research), the two leading parties were in an exact tie, at 32.6% each.<\/p>\n That seems like a long time ago. The Liberals have now dipped to historic lows two weeks in a row.<\/p>\n In an EKOS poll released to the CBC today, the Conservatives had 40.7% of the vote, followed by the Liberals at 25.5%, with the NDP at 14.3%, the Greens at 10.5% and the BQ at 9.1%.<\/p>\n Whenever you see this kind of dramatic shift, you hear pollsters talk about the leading party \u201capproaching majority territory\u201d or \u201cin majority territory\u201d. Sometimes, these are just educated guesses, but at EKOS, we have been running our numbers through a seat projection model — one that proved extremely accurate in the last election.<\/p>\n So here\u2019s where we appear to be now. The Tories are now trading in comfortable majority territory. If an election were held today, and the results mirrored EKOS latest poll down to the regional level, this would be the likely result as translated into seats:<\/p>\n Conservatives 167<\/p>\n Liberals <\/span>68<\/p>\n BQ <\/span>50<\/p>\n NDP <\/span>23<\/p>\n Greens <\/span>0<\/p>\n Since a bare majority would be 155 seats, a result like this would constitute a \u201ccomfortable majority\u201d: that is, not one that would be shaken by the odd defection or by-election reverse. There\u2019s a good chance a parliament like this would last a full four-year term.<\/p>\n In terms of regional strength, the Conservatives would be able to claim that they were a national party, representing every region with a significant number of seats, including Quebec, where the EKOS projection suggests they would hold 10 seats.<\/p>\n The Liberals, in contrast, would hold just 10 seats west of Ontario, almost all of them in British Columbia. They would trail the Conservatives in every region in the country except Quebec, where, despite having similar popular support to the Conservatives, they would win a few more seats due to a more efficient distribution of votes. (The BQ, naturally, would be far away of the other two parties in the province.)<\/p>\n In Ontario \u2013 a province that the Liberals were able to sweep in the last decade, winning virtually every seat \u2013 the Conservatives would win 68 seats to the Liberals\u2019 28, and the NDP\u2019s 10.<\/p>\n Of course, as Harold Wilson famously remarked, \u201ca week is a long time in politics\u201d. A lot can change between now and the election in terms of popular support and the distribution of seats.<\/p>\n But if the Conservatives seem to have a special spring in their step these days, while the Liberals seem to slouch a little, this is why.<\/p>\n — adapted from a blog posting on the www.ekospolitics.com website<\/p>\n Paul Adams teaches journalism at Carleton and is executive director of EKOS Research Associates<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Paul Adams There has been a dramatic shift in the Canadian political landscape in recent months. During the summer, the Liberals gradually gave up the advantage they had enjoyed over the Conservatives during most of the spring; but even as recently as the first weekly poll in September from EKOS (where I participate in the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all","category-political-stragegy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1216"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1216\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1217,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1216\/revisions\/1217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}