{"id":1540,"date":"2011-04-13T02:48:58","date_gmt":"2011-04-13T07:48:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/?p=1540"},"modified":"2011-04-13T02:56:42","modified_gmt":"2011-04-13T07:56:42","slug":"right-format-wrong-participants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/?p=1540","title":{"rendered":"Right format, wrong participants"},"content":{"rendered":"

Christopher Waddell<\/strong><\/p>\n

The mixture of one-on-one and group engagement in last night\u2019s debate highlighted why the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP are so happy that the broadcast consortium did their dirty work for them in being the bad guys who excluded Elizabeth May and the Green Party from the debates.<\/p>\n

Mr Duceppe\u2019s presence provides tangible benefits to each of the other three parties while Ms May poses a threat none of them need or want on display.\u00a0 As a result,\u00a0 the format worked for the parties but not for voters.<\/p>\n

The one-on-one sessions between Mr Duceppe and each of the others leaders were largely irrelevant. Each was debating someone who can\u2019t cost them any votes or threaten the $2 subsidy that goes with every vote each party receives.<\/p>\n

The low point came in the exchange between Mr Duceppe and Mr Layton where it appeared at a couple of moments that they had simply run out of things to say and were hoping moderator Steve Paikin would put them out of their misery by ending their session early.<\/p>\n

Replace Mr Duceppe with Ms May and the dynamic changes completely.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Her exchanges with Mr Layton and Mr Ignatieff would have had real meaning as the Greens, running in ridings all across the country, are a realistic threat to take votes and that $2 per ballot away from both the Liberals and NDP as well as being a gadfly to Mr Harper. The Liberals and NDP were thrilled not to have to worry about that last night.<\/p>\n

For his part Mr Harper would much rather have Mr Duceppe than Ms May on the stage but for different reasons.<\/p>\n

The Bloc leader had a curiously listless and scattered performance – at times looking bored with the whole thing while bouncing back and forth between wanting to debate events that took place five and six years ago and making current demands for more for Quebec.<\/p>\n

All that played directly into Mr Harper\u2019s hands. That strident push for more for Quebec whether it is applying provincial language laws to federal jurisdiction within the province or attacking the Lower Churchill hydro project helped the Conservative leader make his case that if voters don’t give Mr. Harper a majority, the Liberals and NDP will have to dance to the Bloc’s tune if they try to form a government in the next parliament.<\/p>\n

The revised format worked to a degree but the failure to include Ms May in the debate demonstrated the extent to which the broadcast consortium is simply an agent for the parties on the stage.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s an embarrassing role for news organizations to be playing in an election campaign.<\/p>\n

Christopher Waddell is director of the School of Journalism and Communication at Carleton University. He is a former reporter, Ottawa bureau chief for the Globe and Mail and a former CBC-TV parliamentary bureau chief and executive producer-news specials for CBC TV News.\u00a0You can follow him on Twitter @cwaddell27<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Christopher Waddell The mixture of one-on-one and group engagement in last night\u2019s debate highlighted why the Liberals, Conservatives and NDP are so happy that the broadcast consortium did their dirty work for them in being the bad guys who excluded Elizabeth May and the Green Party from the debates. Mr Duceppe\u2019s presence provides tangible benefits […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,17,18,19,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all","category-election-2011","category-election-2011-campaign-strategy","category-election-2011-faculty-links","category-election-2011-media-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1540"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1540\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1546,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1540\/revisions\/1546"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cusjc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}